Mohammad Kaif Questions BCCI Over Rishabh Pant’s Removal as Test Vice-Captain
Contents
A Controversial Shift in Leadership
The recent announcement of the Indian cricket squads for the upcoming Test and ODI series against Afghanistan has sparked significant debate within the cricketing fraternity. While the appointment of Shubman Gill as captain for both formats marks a new era, the shifting dynamics of the vice-captaincy have drawn sharp criticism from former Indian international Mohammad Kaif.
Kaif Defends Pant’s Credentials
In the new squad setup, KL Rahul has been appointed as the vice-captain for the Test matches, while Shreyas Iyer takes the role for the ODI series. This move effectively sidelines Rishabh Pant, who previously served as the vice-captain and even led the national side during the home series against South Africa. Mohammad Kaif, speaking on JioStar, expressed his confusion regarding the rationale behind this decision.
“Pant hasn’t done anything wrong. Both ODI and Tests are totally different formats,” Kaif asserted. He emphasized that Pant’s performance in the longest format of the game has been exemplary. In 2025 alone, the 28-year-old was the fifth-highest run-scorer in Test cricket, amassing 629 runs across seven matches. His average of 48, paired with two centuries and four half-centuries, underscores his value as a premier Test batter.
Separating Formats and IPL Performances
A primary point of contention for Kaif is the apparent reliance on T20 franchise performances to dictate Test match leadership roles. There has been widespread speculation that Pant’s struggles in the IPL—both as a captain for LSG and as a batter—influenced the selectors’ decision to demote him. Kaif, however, remains firm in his stance: “You are judging Pant based on his IPL captaincy skills. There are talks that under his captaincy, the team is losing, and the player himself is not scoring runs. But Rishabh Pant is India’s biggest match-winner in the Test format as a batter.”
Inconsistency in Selection Policies
The conversation regarding selection criteria took a broader turn as Kaif addressed the omission of veteran pacer Mohammed Shami. Despite Shami demonstrating fitness and form, chairman of selectors Ajit Agarkar noted that medical reports suggested the veteran’s body was only prepared for T20 cricket. Furthermore, the decision to rest Jasprit Bumrah has opened the door for Mohammed Siraj and Prasidh Krishna to spearhead the attack, with debutant Gurnoor Brar also joining the ranks.
Kaif challenged the logic behind the selectors’ justifications, particularly concerning age and consistency. “KL is 34, you don’t pick Shami because of his age, but appoint Rahul as the vice-captain. The selectors have to be consistent,” he pointed out. According to the former batter, the focus should remain strictly on performance metrics rather than arbitrary age-related benchmarks.
Looking Ahead: Form Over Factors
The core of Kaif’s argument is that the management should prioritize a player’s current impact on the field. “I would urge them to go by form and not look at the age factor. If a player is scoring runs and picking wickets, he should be selected,” Kaif added. His sentiment reflects a growing concern among fans and pundits that leadership roles should be handled with continuity, especially for players who have cemented their status as match-winners in specific formats.
As India prepares for the Afghanistan series, all eyes will be on how the team performs under the new leadership structure. While Rishabh Pant retains his place in the Test squad, his absence from the vice-captaincy role is likely to remain a talking point until the team finds consistent success on the field. The selectors now face the pressure of proving that these strategic shifts were indeed for the betterment of the team’s future, rather than reactionary decisions based on short-term T20 form.
